http://purl.org/np/RAtp7cD32e2u96irjpiFZ74kxco5AiImWkYWi8-UAebHc#Head http://purl.org/np/RAtp7cD32e2u96irjpiFZ74kxco5AiImWkYWi8-UAebHc http://www.nanopub.org/nschema#hasAssertion http://purl.org/np/RAtp7cD32e2u96irjpiFZ74kxco5AiImWkYWi8-UAebHc#assertion http://purl.org/np/RAtp7cD32e2u96irjpiFZ74kxco5AiImWkYWi8-UAebHc http://www.nanopub.org/nschema#hasProvenance http://purl.org/np/RAtp7cD32e2u96irjpiFZ74kxco5AiImWkYWi8-UAebHc#provenance http://purl.org/np/RAtp7cD32e2u96irjpiFZ74kxco5AiImWkYWi8-UAebHc http://www.nanopub.org/nschema#hasPublicationInfo http://purl.org/np/RAtp7cD32e2u96irjpiFZ74kxco5AiImWkYWi8-UAebHc#pubinfo http://purl.org/np/RAtp7cD32e2u96irjpiFZ74kxco5AiImWkYWi8-UAebHc http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type http://www.nanopub.org/nschema#Nanopublication http://purl.org/np/RAtp7cD32e2u96irjpiFZ74kxco5AiImWkYWi8-UAebHc#assertion http://purl.org/np/RAtp7cD32e2u96irjpiFZ74kxco5AiImWkYWi8-UAebHc#comment-7 http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type https://github.com/LaraHack/linkflows_model/blob/master/Linkflows.ttl#ActionNeededComment http://purl.org/np/RAtp7cD32e2u96irjpiFZ74kxco5AiImWkYWi8-UAebHc#comment-7 http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type https://github.com/LaraHack/linkflows_model/blob/master/Linkflows.ttl#ContentComment http://purl.org/np/RAtp7cD32e2u96irjpiFZ74kxco5AiImWkYWi8-UAebHc#comment-7 http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type https://github.com/LaraHack/linkflows_model/blob/master/Linkflows.ttl#NegativeComment http://purl.org/np/RAtp7cD32e2u96irjpiFZ74kxco5AiImWkYWi8-UAebHc#comment-7 http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type https://github.com/LaraHack/linkflows_model/blob/master/Linkflows.ttl#ReviewComment http://purl.org/np/RAtp7cD32e2u96irjpiFZ74kxco5AiImWkYWi8-UAebHc#comment-7 https://github.com/LaraHack/linkflows_model/blob/master/Linkflows.ttl#hasCommentText * The evaluation of classification performance (Section 11.1) is conducted in a rather lenient fashion only, as full credit is given to partial overlap of predicted and correct chunks of text. At least for comparison, I would like to see a more strict setting relying on complete overlap (or a discussion why this is not feasible). What is more, it seems to me that chunks that are labeled with "0" in the gold standard (i.e., should not be labeled by the system) are excluded from the evaluation in the first place. http://purl.org/np/RAtp7cD32e2u96irjpiFZ74kxco5AiImWkYWi8-UAebHc#comment-7 https://github.com/LaraHack/linkflows_model/blob/master/Linkflows.ttl#hasImpact 3 http://purl.org/np/RAtp7cD32e2u96irjpiFZ74kxco5AiImWkYWi8-UAebHc#comment-7 https://github.com/LaraHack/linkflows_model/blob/master/Linkflows.ttl#refersTo http://purl.org/np/RA2rF-QIYcp-ZXX6ogE_85oprXSLxGxpiwFe-jRgtRrns#section http://purl.org/np/RAtp7cD32e2u96irjpiFZ74kxco5AiImWkYWi8-UAebHc#provenance http://purl.org/np/RAtp7cD32e2u96irjpiFZ74kxco5AiImWkYWi8-UAebHc#assertion http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#hadPrimarySource http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/SW-170269 http://purl.org/np/RAtp7cD32e2u96irjpiFZ74kxco5AiImWkYWi8-UAebHc#assertion http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasAttributedTo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6549-066X http://purl.org/np/RAtp7cD32e2u96irjpiFZ74kxco5AiImWkYWi8-UAebHc#pubinfo http://purl.org/np/RAtp7cD32e2u96irjpiFZ74kxco5AiImWkYWi8-UAebHc http://purl.org/dc/terms/created 2019-11-26T09:05:11+01:00 http://purl.org/np/RAtp7cD32e2u96irjpiFZ74kxco5AiImWkYWi8-UAebHc http://purl.org/pav/createdBy https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7114-6459