http://purl.org/np/RAoBJ8VHoXNe4FOIwoD8wNE4J6zrcrgar5wFEuv29-5Jk#Head http://purl.org/np/RAoBJ8VHoXNe4FOIwoD8wNE4J6zrcrgar5wFEuv29-5Jk http://www.nanopub.org/nschema#hasAssertion http://purl.org/np/RAoBJ8VHoXNe4FOIwoD8wNE4J6zrcrgar5wFEuv29-5Jk#assertion http://purl.org/np/RAoBJ8VHoXNe4FOIwoD8wNE4J6zrcrgar5wFEuv29-5Jk http://www.nanopub.org/nschema#hasProvenance http://purl.org/np/RAoBJ8VHoXNe4FOIwoD8wNE4J6zrcrgar5wFEuv29-5Jk#provenance http://purl.org/np/RAoBJ8VHoXNe4FOIwoD8wNE4J6zrcrgar5wFEuv29-5Jk http://www.nanopub.org/nschema#hasPublicationInfo http://purl.org/np/RAoBJ8VHoXNe4FOIwoD8wNE4J6zrcrgar5wFEuv29-5Jk#pubinfo http://purl.org/np/RAoBJ8VHoXNe4FOIwoD8wNE4J6zrcrgar5wFEuv29-5Jk http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type http://www.nanopub.org/nschema#Nanopublication http://purl.org/np/RAoBJ8VHoXNe4FOIwoD8wNE4J6zrcrgar5wFEuv29-5Jk#assertion http://purl.org/np/RAoBJ8VHoXNe4FOIwoD8wNE4J6zrcrgar5wFEuv29-5Jk#comment-8 http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type https://github.com/LaraHack/linkflows_model/blob/master/Linkflows.ttl#ActionNeededComment http://purl.org/np/RAoBJ8VHoXNe4FOIwoD8wNE4J6zrcrgar5wFEuv29-5Jk#comment-8 http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type https://github.com/LaraHack/linkflows_model/blob/master/Linkflows.ttl#ContentComment http://purl.org/np/RAoBJ8VHoXNe4FOIwoD8wNE4J6zrcrgar5wFEuv29-5Jk#comment-8 http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type https://github.com/LaraHack/linkflows_model/blob/master/Linkflows.ttl#NegativeComment http://purl.org/np/RAoBJ8VHoXNe4FOIwoD8wNE4J6zrcrgar5wFEuv29-5Jk#comment-8 http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type https://github.com/LaraHack/linkflows_model/blob/master/Linkflows.ttl#ReviewComment http://purl.org/np/RAoBJ8VHoXNe4FOIwoD8wNE4J6zrcrgar5wFEuv29-5Jk#comment-8 https://github.com/LaraHack/linkflows_model/blob/master/Linkflows.ttl#hasCommentText I have a number of concerns on the employed triples. The experts were given the opportunity to find quality issues in triples that were (i) random, (ii) instances of some class or (iii) manually selected; while this can appear reasonable, the effects are that the workers' crowds (in both experimental workflows) were presented with information "chosen" by somebody else, thus possibly making the task hard or even impossible because of the triples' domain. I would have expected the authors to make a *controlled experiment*, i.e. selecting a general-purpose subset of DBpedia that - at least from the point of view of the content - was at the same "difficulty" level for all the involved crowds. http://purl.org/np/RAoBJ8VHoXNe4FOIwoD8wNE4J6zrcrgar5wFEuv29-5Jk#comment-8 https://github.com/LaraHack/linkflows_model/blob/master/Linkflows.ttl#hasImpact 4 http://purl.org/np/RAoBJ8VHoXNe4FOIwoD8wNE4J6zrcrgar5wFEuv29-5Jk#comment-8 https://github.com/LaraHack/linkflows_model/blob/master/Linkflows.ttl#refersTo http://purl.org/np/RA29zgFEvuBipvMqnrhYli8ZT6sLM6CE6lhJtDm-G6I3g#section http://purl.org/np/RAoBJ8VHoXNe4FOIwoD8wNE4J6zrcrgar5wFEuv29-5Jk#provenance http://purl.org/np/RAoBJ8VHoXNe4FOIwoD8wNE4J6zrcrgar5wFEuv29-5Jk#assertion http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#hadPrimarySource http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/sw-160239 http://purl.org/np/RAoBJ8VHoXNe4FOIwoD8wNE4J6zrcrgar5wFEuv29-5Jk#assertion http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasAttributedTo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9962-7193 http://purl.org/np/RAoBJ8VHoXNe4FOIwoD8wNE4J6zrcrgar5wFEuv29-5Jk#pubinfo http://purl.org/np/RAoBJ8VHoXNe4FOIwoD8wNE4J6zrcrgar5wFEuv29-5Jk http://purl.org/dc/terms/created 2019-11-26T09:05:11+01:00 http://purl.org/np/RAoBJ8VHoXNe4FOIwoD8wNE4J6zrcrgar5wFEuv29-5Jk http://purl.org/pav/createdBy https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7114-6459