http://purl.org/np/RAoBJ8VHoXNe4FOIwoD8wNE4J6zrcrgar5wFEuv29-5Jk#Head
http://purl.org/np/RAoBJ8VHoXNe4FOIwoD8wNE4J6zrcrgar5wFEuv29-5Jk
http://www.nanopub.org/nschema#hasAssertion
http://purl.org/np/RAoBJ8VHoXNe4FOIwoD8wNE4J6zrcrgar5wFEuv29-5Jk#assertion
http://purl.org/np/RAoBJ8VHoXNe4FOIwoD8wNE4J6zrcrgar5wFEuv29-5Jk
http://www.nanopub.org/nschema#hasProvenance
http://purl.org/np/RAoBJ8VHoXNe4FOIwoD8wNE4J6zrcrgar5wFEuv29-5Jk#provenance
http://purl.org/np/RAoBJ8VHoXNe4FOIwoD8wNE4J6zrcrgar5wFEuv29-5Jk
http://www.nanopub.org/nschema#hasPublicationInfo
http://purl.org/np/RAoBJ8VHoXNe4FOIwoD8wNE4J6zrcrgar5wFEuv29-5Jk#pubinfo
http://purl.org/np/RAoBJ8VHoXNe4FOIwoD8wNE4J6zrcrgar5wFEuv29-5Jk
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type
http://www.nanopub.org/nschema#Nanopublication
http://purl.org/np/RAoBJ8VHoXNe4FOIwoD8wNE4J6zrcrgar5wFEuv29-5Jk#assertion
http://purl.org/np/RAoBJ8VHoXNe4FOIwoD8wNE4J6zrcrgar5wFEuv29-5Jk#comment-8
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type
https://github.com/LaraHack/linkflows_model/blob/master/Linkflows.ttl#ActionNeededComment
http://purl.org/np/RAoBJ8VHoXNe4FOIwoD8wNE4J6zrcrgar5wFEuv29-5Jk#comment-8
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type
https://github.com/LaraHack/linkflows_model/blob/master/Linkflows.ttl#ContentComment
http://purl.org/np/RAoBJ8VHoXNe4FOIwoD8wNE4J6zrcrgar5wFEuv29-5Jk#comment-8
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type
https://github.com/LaraHack/linkflows_model/blob/master/Linkflows.ttl#NegativeComment
http://purl.org/np/RAoBJ8VHoXNe4FOIwoD8wNE4J6zrcrgar5wFEuv29-5Jk#comment-8
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type
https://github.com/LaraHack/linkflows_model/blob/master/Linkflows.ttl#ReviewComment
http://purl.org/np/RAoBJ8VHoXNe4FOIwoD8wNE4J6zrcrgar5wFEuv29-5Jk#comment-8
https://github.com/LaraHack/linkflows_model/blob/master/Linkflows.ttl#hasCommentText
I have a number of concerns on the employed triples. The experts were given the opportunity to find quality issues in triples that were (i) random, (ii) instances of some class or (iii) manually selected; while this can appear reasonable, the effects are that the workers' crowds (in both experimental workflows) were presented with information "chosen" by somebody else, thus possibly making the task hard or even impossible because of the triples' domain. I would have expected the authors to make a *controlled experiment*, i.e. selecting a general-purpose subset of DBpedia that - at least from the point of view of the content - was at the same "difficulty" level for all the involved crowds.
http://purl.org/np/RAoBJ8VHoXNe4FOIwoD8wNE4J6zrcrgar5wFEuv29-5Jk#comment-8
https://github.com/LaraHack/linkflows_model/blob/master/Linkflows.ttl#hasImpact
4
http://purl.org/np/RAoBJ8VHoXNe4FOIwoD8wNE4J6zrcrgar5wFEuv29-5Jk#comment-8
https://github.com/LaraHack/linkflows_model/blob/master/Linkflows.ttl#refersTo
http://purl.org/np/RA29zgFEvuBipvMqnrhYli8ZT6sLM6CE6lhJtDm-G6I3g#section
http://purl.org/np/RAoBJ8VHoXNe4FOIwoD8wNE4J6zrcrgar5wFEuv29-5Jk#provenance
http://purl.org/np/RAoBJ8VHoXNe4FOIwoD8wNE4J6zrcrgar5wFEuv29-5Jk#assertion
http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#hadPrimarySource
http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/sw-160239
http://purl.org/np/RAoBJ8VHoXNe4FOIwoD8wNE4J6zrcrgar5wFEuv29-5Jk#assertion
http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasAttributedTo
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9962-7193
http://purl.org/np/RAoBJ8VHoXNe4FOIwoD8wNE4J6zrcrgar5wFEuv29-5Jk#pubinfo
http://purl.org/np/RAoBJ8VHoXNe4FOIwoD8wNE4J6zrcrgar5wFEuv29-5Jk
http://purl.org/dc/terms/created
2019-11-26T09:05:11+01:00
http://purl.org/np/RAoBJ8VHoXNe4FOIwoD8wNE4J6zrcrgar5wFEuv29-5Jk
http://purl.org/pav/createdBy
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7114-6459