http://purl.org/np/RAl3eT6d9a8LC6qHVDAAC1xQZJ-b2fyKrXENg_Ii1Xois#Head
http://purl.org/np/RAl3eT6d9a8LC6qHVDAAC1xQZJ-b2fyKrXENg_Ii1Xois
http://www.nanopub.org/nschema#hasAssertion
http://purl.org/np/RAl3eT6d9a8LC6qHVDAAC1xQZJ-b2fyKrXENg_Ii1Xois#assertion
http://purl.org/np/RAl3eT6d9a8LC6qHVDAAC1xQZJ-b2fyKrXENg_Ii1Xois
http://www.nanopub.org/nschema#hasProvenance
http://purl.org/np/RAl3eT6d9a8LC6qHVDAAC1xQZJ-b2fyKrXENg_Ii1Xois#provenance
http://purl.org/np/RAl3eT6d9a8LC6qHVDAAC1xQZJ-b2fyKrXENg_Ii1Xois
http://www.nanopub.org/nschema#hasPublicationInfo
http://purl.org/np/RAl3eT6d9a8LC6qHVDAAC1xQZJ-b2fyKrXENg_Ii1Xois#pubinfo
http://purl.org/np/RAl3eT6d9a8LC6qHVDAAC1xQZJ-b2fyKrXENg_Ii1Xois
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type
http://www.nanopub.org/nschema#Nanopublication
http://purl.org/np/RAl3eT6d9a8LC6qHVDAAC1xQZJ-b2fyKrXENg_Ii1Xois#assertion
http://purl.org/np/RAl3eT6d9a8LC6qHVDAAC1xQZJ-b2fyKrXENg_Ii1Xois#comment-9
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type
https://github.com/LaraHack/linkflows_model/blob/master/Linkflows.ttl#ActionNeededComment
http://purl.org/np/RAl3eT6d9a8LC6qHVDAAC1xQZJ-b2fyKrXENg_Ii1Xois#comment-9
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type
https://github.com/LaraHack/linkflows_model/blob/master/Linkflows.ttl#ContentComment
http://purl.org/np/RAl3eT6d9a8LC6qHVDAAC1xQZJ-b2fyKrXENg_Ii1Xois#comment-9
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type
https://github.com/LaraHack/linkflows_model/blob/master/Linkflows.ttl#NegativeComment
http://purl.org/np/RAl3eT6d9a8LC6qHVDAAC1xQZJ-b2fyKrXENg_Ii1Xois#comment-9
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type
https://github.com/LaraHack/linkflows_model/blob/master/Linkflows.ttl#ReviewComment
http://purl.org/np/RAl3eT6d9a8LC6qHVDAAC1xQZJ-b2fyKrXENg_Ii1Xois#comment-9
https://github.com/LaraHack/linkflows_model/blob/master/Linkflows.ttl#hasCommentText
Restricting to a set of selected subjects, I think that not all triples were suitable for the intended experiments; indeed, some specific cases emerged that are not related to the intrinsic characteristics of quality assurance; while it is generally ok to let the experimenters find out problems, it is also reasonable to think that, when preparing an experiment, the obvious things that can lead to problems are avoided. Some examples: - specific datatype objects (like dates vs. numbers, which are definitely ok to be mistaken) - owl:sameAs links (which maybe were interpreted in a "purist" way by LD experts who can be careful in accepting those triples because of their logical implications) - rdf:type triples among the incorrect link issues (apparently unclear for the MTurk workers, but partially also to me: why did rdf:type triples were considered among the "links" instead of the "values"?) - DBpedia translation-specific triples (which do not make any sense in such an evaluation setting, and should have been filtered out in the first place).
http://purl.org/np/RAl3eT6d9a8LC6qHVDAAC1xQZJ-b2fyKrXENg_Ii1Xois#comment-9
https://github.com/LaraHack/linkflows_model/blob/master/Linkflows.ttl#hasImpact
4
http://purl.org/np/RAl3eT6d9a8LC6qHVDAAC1xQZJ-b2fyKrXENg_Ii1Xois#comment-9
https://github.com/LaraHack/linkflows_model/blob/master/Linkflows.ttl#refersTo
http://purl.org/np/RA29zgFEvuBipvMqnrhYli8ZT6sLM6CE6lhJtDm-G6I3g#section
http://purl.org/np/RAl3eT6d9a8LC6qHVDAAC1xQZJ-b2fyKrXENg_Ii1Xois#provenance
http://purl.org/np/RAl3eT6d9a8LC6qHVDAAC1xQZJ-b2fyKrXENg_Ii1Xois#assertion
http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#hadPrimarySource
http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/sw-160239
http://purl.org/np/RAl3eT6d9a8LC6qHVDAAC1xQZJ-b2fyKrXENg_Ii1Xois#assertion
http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasAttributedTo
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9962-7193
http://purl.org/np/RAl3eT6d9a8LC6qHVDAAC1xQZJ-b2fyKrXENg_Ii1Xois#pubinfo
http://purl.org/np/RAl3eT6d9a8LC6qHVDAAC1xQZJ-b2fyKrXENg_Ii1Xois
http://purl.org/dc/terms/created
2019-11-26T09:05:11+01:00
http://purl.org/np/RAl3eT6d9a8LC6qHVDAAC1xQZJ-b2fyKrXENg_Ii1Xois
http://purl.org/pav/createdBy
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7114-6459