http://purl.org/np/RAl3eT6d9a8LC6qHVDAAC1xQZJ-b2fyKrXENg_Ii1Xois#Head http://purl.org/np/RAl3eT6d9a8LC6qHVDAAC1xQZJ-b2fyKrXENg_Ii1Xois http://www.nanopub.org/nschema#hasAssertion http://purl.org/np/RAl3eT6d9a8LC6qHVDAAC1xQZJ-b2fyKrXENg_Ii1Xois#assertion http://purl.org/np/RAl3eT6d9a8LC6qHVDAAC1xQZJ-b2fyKrXENg_Ii1Xois http://www.nanopub.org/nschema#hasProvenance http://purl.org/np/RAl3eT6d9a8LC6qHVDAAC1xQZJ-b2fyKrXENg_Ii1Xois#provenance http://purl.org/np/RAl3eT6d9a8LC6qHVDAAC1xQZJ-b2fyKrXENg_Ii1Xois http://www.nanopub.org/nschema#hasPublicationInfo http://purl.org/np/RAl3eT6d9a8LC6qHVDAAC1xQZJ-b2fyKrXENg_Ii1Xois#pubinfo http://purl.org/np/RAl3eT6d9a8LC6qHVDAAC1xQZJ-b2fyKrXENg_Ii1Xois http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type http://www.nanopub.org/nschema#Nanopublication http://purl.org/np/RAl3eT6d9a8LC6qHVDAAC1xQZJ-b2fyKrXENg_Ii1Xois#assertion http://purl.org/np/RAl3eT6d9a8LC6qHVDAAC1xQZJ-b2fyKrXENg_Ii1Xois#comment-9 http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type https://github.com/LaraHack/linkflows_model/blob/master/Linkflows.ttl#ActionNeededComment http://purl.org/np/RAl3eT6d9a8LC6qHVDAAC1xQZJ-b2fyKrXENg_Ii1Xois#comment-9 http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type https://github.com/LaraHack/linkflows_model/blob/master/Linkflows.ttl#ContentComment http://purl.org/np/RAl3eT6d9a8LC6qHVDAAC1xQZJ-b2fyKrXENg_Ii1Xois#comment-9 http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type https://github.com/LaraHack/linkflows_model/blob/master/Linkflows.ttl#NegativeComment http://purl.org/np/RAl3eT6d9a8LC6qHVDAAC1xQZJ-b2fyKrXENg_Ii1Xois#comment-9 http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type https://github.com/LaraHack/linkflows_model/blob/master/Linkflows.ttl#ReviewComment http://purl.org/np/RAl3eT6d9a8LC6qHVDAAC1xQZJ-b2fyKrXENg_Ii1Xois#comment-9 https://github.com/LaraHack/linkflows_model/blob/master/Linkflows.ttl#hasCommentText Restricting to a set of selected subjects, I think that not all triples were suitable for the intended experiments; indeed, some specific cases emerged that are not related to the intrinsic characteristics of quality assurance; while it is generally ok to let the experimenters find out problems, it is also reasonable to think that, when preparing an experiment, the obvious things that can lead to problems are avoided. Some examples: - specific datatype objects (like dates vs. numbers, which are definitely ok to be mistaken) - owl:sameAs links (which maybe were interpreted in a "purist" way by LD experts who can be careful in accepting those triples because of their logical implications) - rdf:type triples among the incorrect link issues (apparently unclear for the MTurk workers, but partially also to me: why did rdf:type triples were considered among the "links" instead of the "values"?) - DBpedia translation-specific triples (which do not make any sense in such an evaluation setting, and should have been filtered out in the first place). http://purl.org/np/RAl3eT6d9a8LC6qHVDAAC1xQZJ-b2fyKrXENg_Ii1Xois#comment-9 https://github.com/LaraHack/linkflows_model/blob/master/Linkflows.ttl#hasImpact 4 http://purl.org/np/RAl3eT6d9a8LC6qHVDAAC1xQZJ-b2fyKrXENg_Ii1Xois#comment-9 https://github.com/LaraHack/linkflows_model/blob/master/Linkflows.ttl#refersTo http://purl.org/np/RA29zgFEvuBipvMqnrhYli8ZT6sLM6CE6lhJtDm-G6I3g#section http://purl.org/np/RAl3eT6d9a8LC6qHVDAAC1xQZJ-b2fyKrXENg_Ii1Xois#provenance http://purl.org/np/RAl3eT6d9a8LC6qHVDAAC1xQZJ-b2fyKrXENg_Ii1Xois#assertion http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#hadPrimarySource http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/sw-160239 http://purl.org/np/RAl3eT6d9a8LC6qHVDAAC1xQZJ-b2fyKrXENg_Ii1Xois#assertion http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasAttributedTo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9962-7193 http://purl.org/np/RAl3eT6d9a8LC6qHVDAAC1xQZJ-b2fyKrXENg_Ii1Xois#pubinfo http://purl.org/np/RAl3eT6d9a8LC6qHVDAAC1xQZJ-b2fyKrXENg_Ii1Xois http://purl.org/dc/terms/created 2019-11-26T09:05:11+01:00 http://purl.org/np/RAl3eT6d9a8LC6qHVDAAC1xQZJ-b2fyKrXENg_Ii1Xois http://purl.org/pav/createdBy https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7114-6459