@prefix dc: <http://purl.org/dc/terms/> .
@prefix this: <http://purl.org/np/RAiULhd3s71ZNYHp4xVh8KtXZw6boB9q9SrVvAK72y44s> .
@prefix sub: <http://purl.org/np/RAiULhd3s71ZNYHp4xVh8KtXZw6boB9q9SrVvAK72y44s#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix pav: <http://purl.org/pav/> .
@prefix np: <http://www.nanopub.org/nschema#> .
@prefix linkflows: <https://github.com/LaraHack/linkflows_model/blob/master/Linkflows.ttl#> .
sub:Head {
  this: np:hasAssertion sub:assertion ;
    np:hasProvenance sub:provenance ;
    np:hasPublicationInfo sub:pubinfo ;
    a np:Nanopublication .
}
sub:assertion {
  sub:comment-38 a linkflows:ActionNeededComment , linkflows:ContentComment , linkflows:NegativeComment , linkflows:ReviewComment ;
    linkflows:hasCommentText "page 18, section 5.3.2: the text says 30k triples while table 5 almost 70k triples, so what's the correct number? why was the sample selected on the basis of \"at least two workers\" and not by majority voting? the sample contains the \"exact same number of triples\" or exactly the same triples? why did this Verify stage take more time than in the case of the other workflow?" ;
    linkflows:hasImpact "3"^^xsd:positiveInteger ;
    linkflows:refersTo <http://purl.org/np/RAF6IU1wwVTKGSj1NYWQ2JRQm0FBgANVTh8RY9l5U_vuE#paragraph> .
}
sub:provenance {
  sub:assertion prov:hadPrimarySource <http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/sw-160239> ;
    prov:wasAttributedTo <https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9962-7193> .
}
sub:pubinfo {
  this: dc:created "2019-11-26T09:05:11+01:00"^^xsd:dateTime ;
    pav:createdBy <https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7114-6459> .
}