@prefix dc: .
@prefix this: .
@prefix sub: .
@prefix f3: .
@prefix xsd: .
@prefix prov: .
@prefix pav: .
@prefix np: .
@prefix linkflows: .
sub:Head {
this: np:hasAssertion sub:assertion;
np:hasProvenance sub:provenance;
np:hasPublicationInfo sub:pubinfo;
a np:Nanopublication .
}
sub:assertion {
sub:comment-14 a linkflows:ActionNeededComment, linkflows:ContentComment, linkflows:NegativeComment,
linkflows:ReviewComment;
linkflows:hasCommentText "Regarding the MTurk-based Find stage, I personally find the screenshot in Figure 3 very confusing, since it seems that the Wikipedia column (which should provide the \"human readable\" information) is less complete that the DBpedia column: how were the workers expected to interpret this fact? were they instructed to click on the Wikipedia page link (if provided) to check?";
linkflows:hasImpact "4"^^xsd:positiveInteger;
linkflows:refersTo f3:\#figure .
}
sub:provenance {
sub:assertion prov:hadPrimarySource ;
prov:wasAttributedTo .
}
sub:pubinfo {
this: dc:created "2019-11-26T09:05:11+01:00"^^xsd:dateTime;
pav:createdBy .
}