sub:assertion {
  sub:comment-5 a linkflows:ActionNeededComment , linkflows:ContentComment , linkflows:NegativeComment , linkflows:ReviewComment ;
    linkflows:hasCommentText "*I also do not completely understand the \"anatomy\" (weird term) of the crowdsourcing task: The description in Section 7.2.1 and Figure 3 suggest that the sentence to be annotated is presented to the workers together with the frame label. How can this be determined in advance? I suspect that this is done by assuming a fixed mapping between lexical units and a frame, which obviously neglects potential lexical ambiguity at the level of lexical units. This aspect needs clarification, and it should be quantified to what extent such ambiguities really occur and pose a problem to the system." ;
    linkflows:hasImpact "3"^^xsd:positiveInteger ;
    linkflows:refersTo <http://purl.org/nanopub/temp/linkflows/sample-paper-2/v1/f3#figure> , <http://purl.org/np/RAVvOHUZoDh5eHszog4zZdOAlxErkVbZ1Hif2-taGQOFM#section> .
}