http://purl.org/np/RADmV72LK0__bK2qDVALw2z3LYU2fYcWIVKa1hFcHgPeQ#Head http://purl.org/np/RADmV72LK0__bK2qDVALw2z3LYU2fYcWIVKa1hFcHgPeQ http://www.nanopub.org/nschema#hasAssertion http://purl.org/np/RADmV72LK0__bK2qDVALw2z3LYU2fYcWIVKa1hFcHgPeQ#assertion http://purl.org/np/RADmV72LK0__bK2qDVALw2z3LYU2fYcWIVKa1hFcHgPeQ http://www.nanopub.org/nschema#hasProvenance http://purl.org/np/RADmV72LK0__bK2qDVALw2z3LYU2fYcWIVKa1hFcHgPeQ#provenance http://purl.org/np/RADmV72LK0__bK2qDVALw2z3LYU2fYcWIVKa1hFcHgPeQ http://www.nanopub.org/nschema#hasPublicationInfo http://purl.org/np/RADmV72LK0__bK2qDVALw2z3LYU2fYcWIVKa1hFcHgPeQ#pubinfo http://purl.org/np/RADmV72LK0__bK2qDVALw2z3LYU2fYcWIVKa1hFcHgPeQ http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type http://www.nanopub.org/nschema#Nanopublication http://purl.org/np/RADmV72LK0__bK2qDVALw2z3LYU2fYcWIVKa1hFcHgPeQ#assertion http://purl.org/np/RADmV72LK0__bK2qDVALw2z3LYU2fYcWIVKa1hFcHgPeQ#comment-9 http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type https://github.com/LaraHack/linkflows_model/blob/master/Linkflows.ttl#ActionNeededComment http://purl.org/np/RADmV72LK0__bK2qDVALw2z3LYU2fYcWIVKa1hFcHgPeQ#comment-9 http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type https://github.com/LaraHack/linkflows_model/blob/master/Linkflows.ttl#ContentComment http://purl.org/np/RADmV72LK0__bK2qDVALw2z3LYU2fYcWIVKa1hFcHgPeQ#comment-9 http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type https://github.com/LaraHack/linkflows_model/blob/master/Linkflows.ttl#NegativeComment http://purl.org/np/RADmV72LK0__bK2qDVALw2z3LYU2fYcWIVKa1hFcHgPeQ#comment-9 http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type https://github.com/LaraHack/linkflows_model/blob/master/Linkflows.ttl#ReviewComment http://purl.org/np/RADmV72LK0__bK2qDVALw2z3LYU2fYcWIVKa1hFcHgPeQ#comment-9 https://github.com/LaraHack/linkflows_model/blob/master/Linkflows.ttl#hasCommentText In p.11, Fig 3, the comparison of DBpedia RDF triples (middle column) shown in your tool is compared with wikipedia infobox values (left column) for which you implemented an extractor. How do you ensure that your extractor does not create extraction errors like they are about to occur in the DBpedia infobox which resulted in the RDF triple under consideration? What if both - your wikipedia infobox extractor and the DBpedia RDF triple - show the very same error? Many problems of the DBpedia extractors arise from wrong infobox information, because many wikipedia authors don't care about infobox conventions. Can these kind of errors be detected at all with your crowdsourcing tool (based on the very same mechanisms to give a hint to the crowdworker)? http://purl.org/np/RADmV72LK0__bK2qDVALw2z3LYU2fYcWIVKa1hFcHgPeQ#comment-9 https://github.com/LaraHack/linkflows_model/blob/master/Linkflows.ttl#hasImpact 3 http://purl.org/np/RADmV72LK0__bK2qDVALw2z3LYU2fYcWIVKa1hFcHgPeQ#comment-9 https://github.com/LaraHack/linkflows_model/blob/master/Linkflows.ttl#refersTo http://purl.org/np/RAllHpa22UVMDTHKkHYAm4ob73_y9VvRWon1Rhnf-EJQc#figure http://purl.org/np/RADmV72LK0__bK2qDVALw2z3LYU2fYcWIVKa1hFcHgPeQ#provenance http://purl.org/np/RADmV72LK0__bK2qDVALw2z3LYU2fYcWIVKa1hFcHgPeQ#assertion http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#hadPrimarySource http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/sw-160239 http://purl.org/np/RADmV72LK0__bK2qDVALw2z3LYU2fYcWIVKa1hFcHgPeQ#assertion http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasAttributedTo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7069-9804 http://purl.org/np/RADmV72LK0__bK2qDVALw2z3LYU2fYcWIVKa1hFcHgPeQ#pubinfo http://purl.org/np/RADmV72LK0__bK2qDVALw2z3LYU2fYcWIVKa1hFcHgPeQ http://purl.org/dc/terms/created 2019-11-26T09:05:11+01:00 http://purl.org/np/RADmV72LK0__bK2qDVALw2z3LYU2fYcWIVKa1hFcHgPeQ http://purl.org/pav/createdBy https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7114-6459