http://purl.org/np/RADmV72LK0__bK2qDVALw2z3LYU2fYcWIVKa1hFcHgPeQ#Head
http://purl.org/np/RADmV72LK0__bK2qDVALw2z3LYU2fYcWIVKa1hFcHgPeQ
http://www.nanopub.org/nschema#hasAssertion
http://purl.org/np/RADmV72LK0__bK2qDVALw2z3LYU2fYcWIVKa1hFcHgPeQ#assertion
http://purl.org/np/RADmV72LK0__bK2qDVALw2z3LYU2fYcWIVKa1hFcHgPeQ
http://www.nanopub.org/nschema#hasProvenance
http://purl.org/np/RADmV72LK0__bK2qDVALw2z3LYU2fYcWIVKa1hFcHgPeQ#provenance
http://purl.org/np/RADmV72LK0__bK2qDVALw2z3LYU2fYcWIVKa1hFcHgPeQ
http://www.nanopub.org/nschema#hasPublicationInfo
http://purl.org/np/RADmV72LK0__bK2qDVALw2z3LYU2fYcWIVKa1hFcHgPeQ#pubinfo
http://purl.org/np/RADmV72LK0__bK2qDVALw2z3LYU2fYcWIVKa1hFcHgPeQ
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type
http://www.nanopub.org/nschema#Nanopublication
http://purl.org/np/RADmV72LK0__bK2qDVALw2z3LYU2fYcWIVKa1hFcHgPeQ#assertion
http://purl.org/np/RADmV72LK0__bK2qDVALw2z3LYU2fYcWIVKa1hFcHgPeQ#comment-9
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type
https://github.com/LaraHack/linkflows_model/blob/master/Linkflows.ttl#ActionNeededComment
http://purl.org/np/RADmV72LK0__bK2qDVALw2z3LYU2fYcWIVKa1hFcHgPeQ#comment-9
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type
https://github.com/LaraHack/linkflows_model/blob/master/Linkflows.ttl#ContentComment
http://purl.org/np/RADmV72LK0__bK2qDVALw2z3LYU2fYcWIVKa1hFcHgPeQ#comment-9
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type
https://github.com/LaraHack/linkflows_model/blob/master/Linkflows.ttl#NegativeComment
http://purl.org/np/RADmV72LK0__bK2qDVALw2z3LYU2fYcWIVKa1hFcHgPeQ#comment-9
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type
https://github.com/LaraHack/linkflows_model/blob/master/Linkflows.ttl#ReviewComment
http://purl.org/np/RADmV72LK0__bK2qDVALw2z3LYU2fYcWIVKa1hFcHgPeQ#comment-9
https://github.com/LaraHack/linkflows_model/blob/master/Linkflows.ttl#hasCommentText
In p.11, Fig 3, the comparison of DBpedia RDF triples (middle column) shown in your tool is compared with wikipedia infobox values (left column) for which you implemented an extractor. How do you ensure that your extractor does not create extraction errors like they are about to occur in the DBpedia infobox which resulted in the RDF triple under consideration? What if both - your wikipedia infobox extractor and the DBpedia RDF triple - show the very same error? Many problems of the DBpedia extractors arise from wrong infobox information, because many wikipedia authors don't care about infobox conventions. Can these kind of errors be detected at all with your crowdsourcing tool (based on the very same mechanisms to give a hint to the crowdworker)?
http://purl.org/np/RADmV72LK0__bK2qDVALw2z3LYU2fYcWIVKa1hFcHgPeQ#comment-9
https://github.com/LaraHack/linkflows_model/blob/master/Linkflows.ttl#hasImpact
3
http://purl.org/np/RADmV72LK0__bK2qDVALw2z3LYU2fYcWIVKa1hFcHgPeQ#comment-9
https://github.com/LaraHack/linkflows_model/blob/master/Linkflows.ttl#refersTo
http://purl.org/np/RAllHpa22UVMDTHKkHYAm4ob73_y9VvRWon1Rhnf-EJQc#figure
http://purl.org/np/RADmV72LK0__bK2qDVALw2z3LYU2fYcWIVKa1hFcHgPeQ#provenance
http://purl.org/np/RADmV72LK0__bK2qDVALw2z3LYU2fYcWIVKa1hFcHgPeQ#assertion
http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#hadPrimarySource
http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/sw-160239
http://purl.org/np/RADmV72LK0__bK2qDVALw2z3LYU2fYcWIVKa1hFcHgPeQ#assertion
http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasAttributedTo
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7069-9804
http://purl.org/np/RADmV72LK0__bK2qDVALw2z3LYU2fYcWIVKa1hFcHgPeQ#pubinfo
http://purl.org/np/RADmV72LK0__bK2qDVALw2z3LYU2fYcWIVKa1hFcHgPeQ
http://purl.org/dc/terms/created
2019-11-26T09:05:11+01:00
http://purl.org/np/RADmV72LK0__bK2qDVALw2z3LYU2fYcWIVKa1hFcHgPeQ
http://purl.org/pav/createdBy
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7114-6459