@prefix dc: .
@prefix this: .
@prefix sub: .
@prefix xsd: .
@prefix prov: .
@prefix pav: .
@prefix np: .
@prefix doco: .
@prefix c4o: .
sub:Head {
this: np:hasAssertion sub:assertion;
np:hasProvenance sub:provenance;
np:hasPublicationInfo sub:pubinfo;
a np:Nanopublication .
}
sub:assertion {
sub:paragraph c4o:hasContent "With respect to frames, we note that ATTIVITÀ is often mistaken for STATO or not classified at all: in fact, the difference between these two frames is quite subtle with respect to their sense. The former is more generic and could also be labeled as CAREER : if we viewed it in a frame hierarchy, it would serve as a superframe of the latter. The latter instead encodes the development modality of a soccer player’s career, e.g., when he remains unbound from some team due to contracting issues. Hence, we may conclude that distin- guishing between these frames is a challenge even for humans. Furthermore, frames with no FEs are classified as “O”, thus considered wrong despite the correct prediction. VITTORIA is almost never mistaken for TROFEO : this is positively surprising, since the FE COMPETIZIONE (frame VITTORIA) is often mistaken for PREMIO (frame TROFEO), but those FEs do not seem to affect the frame classification. Again, such FE distinction must take into account a delicate sense nuance, which is hard for humans as well. Due to an error in the training set crowdsourcing step, we lack of VITTORIA and PARTITA samples.";
a doco:Paragraph .
}
sub:provenance {
sub:assertion prov:hadPrimarySource ;
prov:wasAttributedTo .
}
sub:pubinfo {
this: dc:created "2019-11-10T18:05:11+01:00"^^xsd:dateTime;
pav:createdBy .
}