@prefix dc: <http://purl.org/dc/terms/> .
@prefix this: <http://purl.org/np/RA7DIxI9eF9i4RO4rPRGOC09LgxVnZ-TgG4VvzMJinr-I> .
@prefix sub: <http://purl.org/np/RA7DIxI9eF9i4RO4rPRGOC09LgxVnZ-TgG4VvzMJinr-I#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix pav: <http://purl.org/pav/> .
@prefix np: <http://www.nanopub.org/nschema#> .
@prefix linkflows: <https://github.com/LaraHack/linkflows_model/blob/master/Linkflows.ttl#> .

sub:Head {
  this: np:hasAssertion sub:assertion;
    np:hasProvenance sub:provenance;
    np:hasPublicationInfo sub:pubinfo;
    a np:Nanopublication .
}

sub:assertion {
  sub:comment-7 a linkflows:ActionNeededComment, linkflows:ContentComment, linkflows:NegativeComment,
      linkflows:ReviewComment;
    linkflows:hasCommentText "Regarding the experiments design, my impression is that a number of results are not fully related to the intended characteristics of the experiments (expert vs. laymen crowdsourcing, find vs. verify stage, etc.) but are the collateral effect of non-optimal design choices, in terms of (1) choice of triples/data and quality issues to be tested, (2) user interface and support information provided to participants and (3) reported indicators and baselines.";
    linkflows:hasImpact "4"^^xsd:positiveInteger;
    linkflows:refersTo <http://purl.org/np/RA29zgFEvuBipvMqnrhYli8ZT6sLM6CE6lhJtDm-G6I3g#section> .
}

sub:provenance {
  sub:assertion prov:hadPrimarySource <http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/sw-160239>;
    prov:wasAttributedTo <https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9962-7193> .
}

sub:pubinfo {
  this: dc:created "2019-11-26T09:05:11+01:00"^^xsd:dateTime;
    pav:createdBy <https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7114-6459> .
}