sub:assertion {
  sub:comment-7 a linkflows:ActionNeededComment , linkflows:ContentComment , linkflows:NegativeComment , linkflows:ReviewComment ;
    linkflows:hasCommentText "It should be better explained why the WiseNET ontology redefines part of the content of ifcowl (e.g. properties “aggregates”, “spaceContains”). Why isn’t it enough to extract a fragment of ifcowl and use it in integration with other ontology modules? This would allow to skip a few query+update steps in the proposed methodology." ;
    linkflows:hasImpact "3"^^xsd:positiveInteger ;
    linkflows:refersTo <http://purl.org/nanopub/temp/linkflows/sample-paper-3/v1/f3#figure> , <http://purl.org/nanopub/temp/linkflows/sample-paper-3/v1/t4#table> , <http://purl.org/nanopub/temp/linkflows/sample-paper-3/v1/t5#table> .
}