@prefix this: <http://purl.org/np/RA2T5lLAUlug8mGH7fYsT1arZUMvPHA8cV1q7S7t_IDCs> .
@prefix sub: <http://purl.org/np/RA2T5lLAUlug8mGH7fYsT1arZUMvPHA8cV1q7S7t_IDCs#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
@prefix dc: <http://purl.org/dc/terms/> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix pav: <http://purl.org/pav/> .
@prefix np: <http://www.nanopub.org/nschema#> .
@prefix doco: <http://purl.org/spar/doco/> .
@prefix c4o: <http://purl.org/spar/c4o/> .

sub:Head {
  this: np:hasAssertion sub:assertion;
    np:hasProvenance sub:provenance;
    np:hasPublicationInfo sub:pubinfo;
    a np:Nanopublication .
}

sub:assertion {
  sub:paragraph c4o:hasContent "RDFUnit 18 [20] is a tool that implements the TDQA methodology. RDFUnit generates automatic test cases for all enabled schemata and checks for common axiom validations. At the time of writing, RDFUnit supports the detection of inconsistencies for domain and range for RDFS and cardinality, disjointness, functionality, symetricity and reflexiveness for OWL under Closed World Assumption (CWA). We re-used the same setup for DBpedia, used by Kontokostas et al. [21] but excluding 830 test cases that were automatically generated for rdfs:range. The dataset was checked against the following schemata (namespaces): dbpedia-19 owl, foaf, dcterms, dc, skos, and geo. In addition, we reused the axioms produced by the ontology enrichment step for DBpedia, as described by Kontokostas et al. [21].";
    a doco:Paragraph .
}

sub:provenance {
  sub:assertion prov:hadPrimarySource <http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/SW-160239>;
    prov:wasAttributedTo <https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0530-4305> .
}

sub:pubinfo {
  this: dc:created "2019-09-20T18:05:11+01:00"^^xsd:dateTime;
    pav:createdBy <https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7114-6459> .
}